They are essentially selfish
motives--that is to say, they are based upon speculations of
national power, territorial aggrandizement, political
advantage, and commercial gain. Neither side can claim any
superiority of principle, or any peculiar purity of
patriotism....
"We certainly cannot discover in these arguments anything to
remove the case from the common category of national or
monarchical quarrels. The representations of the North might
be made word for word by any autocrat or conqueror desirous
of 'rectifying' his frontier, consolidating his empire, or
retaining a disaffected province in subjection. The
manifestos of the South might be put forth by any State
desirous of terminating an unpleasant connexion or exchanging
union for independence....
"It is just such a question as has been left times out of
mind in this Old World to the decision of the sword. The
sword will be the arbitrator in the New World too; but the
event teaches us plainly enough that Republics and
Democracies enjoy no exemption from the passions and follies
of humanity."
Under these impressions Adams presented himself on May 18 for his first
interview with Russell[169]. He stated that he had come with the idea
that there was
".
Pages:
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153