"Until we are positively
informed that our Ministers are guilty of the great crime attributed to
them," the _Herald_ declared, "we must hope against hope that they are
innocent." If guilty they were responsible for the misery of Lancashire
(depicted in lurid colours):
"A clear, a sacred, an all-important duty was imposed upon
them; to perform that duty would have been the pride and
delight of almost any other Englishmen; and they, with the
task before them and the power to perform it in their
hands--can it be that they have shrunk back in craven
cowardice, deserted their ally, betrayed their country,
dishonoured their own names to all eternity, that they might
do the bidding of John Bright, and sustain for a while the
infamous tyranny of a Butler, a Seward, and a Lincoln[827]?"
In the non-political _Army and Navy Gazette_ the returned editor, W.H.
Russell, but lately the _Times_ correspondent in America, jeered at the
American uproar that might now be expected against France instead of
England: "Let the Emperor beware. The scarred veteran of the New York
Scarrons of Plum Gut has set his sinister or dexter eye upon him, and
threatens him with the loss of his throne," but the British public must
expect no lasting change of Northern attitude toward England and must be
ready for a war if the North were victorious[828].
Pages:
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573